I Fill My Free Time Reading Other People’s "Rogue One" Blogs

OK, not really. But I figure this is the most fun a fan can have each time a Star Wars movie is released. You know, reading up on fan theories, hidden eggs in the flick, “connecting the dots” between interviews with cast and crew, seeing the links with past movies, books, etc.

This isn’t so much an overdue review as much as it is a backing of the consensus that has developed around “Rogue One: A Star Wars Story.”

It’s hard to keep up with the latest theorized and essentially confirmed tie-ins from “Rogue One” (I’ll do my best to spare you clear spoilers): 

*That Supreme Leader Snoke DID cross paths here with Darth Vader.

*There are references to characters and ships from “Star Wars Rebels.” (Well, one character crossover is very clear.)

*The Kyber crystals date back to pre-script treatment for “A New Hope.”

*The Force REALLY HAS been one with the entire rebellion and the entire rebellion has really been one with The Force.

This is just the tip of the iceberg. It all provides hours of thrills for fans whose imaginations are broadened by this expanding Star Wars universe (expanding, finally, on the big screen). 

Star Wars has made me cry three times now: 

*The very end of “Return of the Jedi” when I was age 9 and I truly thought it was - back then - the end of the Star Wars saga. 

*A few tears shed in the end of “Rogue One.” The rebels’ sacrifice is fully realized and it’s a breathtaking, dark affair.

*Jar Jar Binks. Because Jar Jar’s appearance essentially symbolizes nearly all of George Lucas’ miscalculations in the prequels.

“Rogue One” is hope, that this enlarging “Star Wars” cinematic universe will only get even better. It will gives more engrossing characters, incredible worlds, engaging scenes of adventure, romance and drama, and fantastic action set pieces.

Was “Rogue One’s” script sublime? No. By no means did it contain the boredom and clunkiness of Lucas’ writing for the prequels. Nor was it a straight call-back to Episode IV or The Force Awakens. 

And yes, Vox, it is a war movie. Because “Star Wars” is about warfare against the backdrop of glorious, strange worlds. Perhaps unlike past SW flicks, “Rogue One” explores the moral complexity of the Rebel Alliance - that the rebels are practically terrorists who do more than they’re willing to admit for a “greater good.”  

Could there have been stronger character development? Sure. But you could say that for most movies. 

All in all, there’s a tremendous story - the end of which we knew already. But how we get there is thrilling and urgent with a dash of disconsolation thrown in. With its expected - and unexpected connections - to other “Star Wars” iterations, it’s a wonderful addition to the SW cinematic family. 

Movies That Are Christmas Movies (Even Though Some of You Feel Otherwise)

During the holiday season, you can only see “It’s a Wonderful Life,” “A Christmas Story” and “Miracle on 34th Street” so many times. 

That’s where quirkiness, creativity and an open mind come into play. You know well there are many flicks that don’t fall into the traditional “Christmas” or holiday film category.

Yet, these are Christmas movies. They are set during the holiday season. Some may even have redeeming quality or two.

So, get some wassail or “special” hot cocoa (you may need plenty of it to really enjoy these holiday classics), relax and let all this cinematic awesomeness take you over. 

Gremlins

If you think about it, Warner Bros., Steven Spielberg, Chris Columbus and Joe Dante were geniuses. Imagine it’s 1984 (I was, umm, youngish). Over the summer, you see this crazy semi-horror comedy about the cutish creature who, in a sense, births nasty little havoc-creating monsters. 

The gremlins take over a small town close to Christmas. You laugh, you cringe, you throw up your hands and say “What in the heck?”

You’re a kid back then. All you want is Gizmo, the mogwai. Darn, he doesn’t actually exist (as far as we know), but you can get him for…wait for it…Christmas! From Ward’s or JC Penney or Sears. Or Toys R’Us. Genius marketing. 

Die Hard

On the face of it, Die Hard launched the modern action movie genre. There have been many imitators…a one-person army against a bunch of baddies. But nothing tops the original Die Hard, for its sheer thrills, drama, dazzling action, and some humor with one-liners thrown in for good measure.

But more than that, it’s a Christmas movie. I mean, c’mon, terrorists take over a Los Angeles office high-rise during a company’s holiday party? Everyone is in the giving spirit. The world is introduced to the great Alan Rickman (rest in peace, sir). We get Bruce Willis, action movie hero. We get Run-DMC’s Christmas song to start, Sammy Cahn singing “Let It Snow” before the end credits roll. What more do you want?

Honorable mention: Die Hard 2 (also set during Christmas in DC. )

Brazil

Once again, imagine yourself in 1984. George Orwell’s “1984” has been made into a movie, which - frankly speaking - was boring. Then imagine you’re Terry Gilliam and want to envision a futuristic totalitarian society in a wild way. 

“Brazil” is it. Don’t ask about the title. Just. Don’t. Instead, just watch a movie with such amazing, daring vision. The plot? Well, it’s a little hard to explain, but it is set during Christmas. Or what’s left of it in this society. 

It plays like a bleak drama, but it’s chock full of dark humor and socio-political satire. You’ll never think of an imagined dictatorship in the same way again.

Night of the Comet

I honestly can’t call Night of the Comet a straight-up horror/sci-fi flick. Sure, it starts with the return of a comet that apparently contributed to the dinosaurs’ demise. But the comet is returning to pass Earth - in one night before Christmas. And mankind is pretty much finished.

All you have left are survivors played by the likes of Kelli Maroney, Catherine Mary Stewart and Robert Beltran, wondering what may come next. 

(Confession: I had the hots for Maroney and Stewart in the 80s. Ok, back to the blog.)

Anyways, it’s a fun lower budget flick that so fits its time and setting: mid-1980s L.A. Like my other mentioned movies, “Night of the Comet has its share of dark humor and satire. For me at this point, it’s all about the 80s nostalgia. 

Lethal Weapon

Before he tackled a somewhat more anti-traditional Christmas movie, “Scrooged,” Richard Donner directed Mel Gibson and Danny Glover in this action-errr, comedy franchise starter. But it has nice blend of action, humor and drama…all set before CHRISTMAS.

Trading Places

John Landis has been one of my favorite directors, mainly for his use of dark humor in a film that may not be seen as strictly slapstick comedy. “The Blues Brothers” was such an example. So is “Trading Places.” Eddie Murphy’s movie career was beginning. Dan Ackroyd was taking off. It was, simply, a perfect comedy SET DURING THE HOLIDAY SEASON.

More honorable mention: Black Christmas; Silent Night, Deadly Night, Bad Santa, Krampus, All Through the House

I didn’t mention Nightmare Before Christmas, Edward Scissorhands, Batman Returns, Home Alone, etc., because it’s naturally assumed these are Christmas-y flicks. Anyways, check these out if you haven’t already. With plenty of wassail.

Playoff college football, or pretending is fun!

Let’s face it — 2016 sucks. Except for the Cubs and Cowboys winning. But let’s wrap it up on a fun note, with my growing tradition. 

As the NCAA has come up with its third edition of a four-team Division I football playoff, it’s that time to imagine a 16-team tournament.

I know, we’ve heard the arguments against practically any playoff. That bowl traditions are dismantled. Student-athletes wouldn’t be able to focus on finals. Schools would lose money. But consider that tournaments haven’t hurt FCS or Division II or III or NAIA schools.

So, fire up those imaginations. Let’s play pretend. Start with automatic champions from FBS (Football Championship Series) conferences -- regular-season champs and championship game victors.

In the instance of co-champions, that conference would determine who gets essentially an automatic FBS bid. From 10 conferences, this year get 12 automatic bids. Average the current computer rankings, and those of Associated Press and coaches polls. Concentrate on schools that get the most place votes, prioritize, and reach a final aggregate Top 25 poll. Top-ranked FBS independents would be considered, of course.

A final 2016 FBS aggregate poll would look like this:

1) Alabama (SEC champion)

2) Clemson (ACC champion)

3) Ohio State 

4) Washington (Pac-12 champion)

5) Penn State (Big 10 champ)

6) Michigan

7) Oklahoma (Big 12 champ)

8) Wisconsin

9) USC

10) Florida State

11) Colorado

12) West Virginia

13) Oklahoma State

14) Western Michigan (MAC champ)

15) Louisville

16) Stanford

17) Auburn

18) Florida

19) Virginia Tech

20) LSU

21) Utah

22) Iowa

23) Pittsburgh

24) Nebraska

25) Temple (AAC champ)

Unranked conference champions

Western Kentucky (Conference USA champion)

San Diego State (Mountain West champion)

Appalachian State (Sun Belt champion)

Ultimately, FBS automatic bids would go to Alabama, Clemson, Washington, Penn State, Oklahoma, Western Michigan, Temple, Western Kentucky, San Diego State, Appalachian State, 

Then look at the next set of highest ranked schools in the aggregate poll. They receive at-large bids: Ohio State, Michigan, Wisconsin, USC, Florida State, Colorado

The final FBS tournament seedings would be in a 16 vs. 1, 15 vs. 2, 14, vs. 3, etc. format. Accordingly, they are: 

1. Alabama

2. Clemson

3. Ohio State

4. Washington

5. Penn State

6. Michigan

7. Oklahoma

8. Wisconsin

9. USC

10. Florida State

11. Colorado

12. Western Michigan

13. Temple

14. Western Kentucky

15. San Diego State

16. Appalachian State

Take a look at the oldest, popular, most lucrative, traditional bowls. Provide some regional interest where established or geographic rivalries may exist. Make those bowls the new FBS playoff matches. And yes, virtually all will be broadcast on ESPN its seemingly hundreds of channels.

Imagine the increased interest from fans, especially for those bowl games that sometimes do not get sold out. Imagine the ratings. Imagine these bowls having truly something at stake — a chance to advance to play for a championship. Just like most other playoffs/tournaments elsewhere on Earth do. Imagine that.

How about dates for these awesome matches? The “younger”-ish/less lucrative bowls would serve essentially as quarterfinals on various days from mid to late December. Using the seeding format — 1 vs. 16, 2 vs. 15, 3 vs. 14, 4 vs. 13, 5 vs. 12, 6 vs. 11, 7 vs. 10, and 8 vs. 9 — this is how this plays out in 2016:

Tuesday, Dec. 13

San Diego State vs. Clemson– Motel 6 Catcus (formerly Copper, Insight, Buffalo Wild Wings); Tempe

Wednesday, Dec. 14

Western Michigan vs. Penn State-- Buffalo Wild Wings Citrus (formerly Tangerine, Capital One); Orlando

Temple vs. Washington-- National Funding (who?) Holiday; San Diego

Thursday, Dec. 15

Western Kentucky vs. Ohio State -- Outback (formerly Hall of Fame); Tampa

Colorado vs. Michigan -- Valero Alamo;

Friday, Dec. 16

Florida State vs. Oklahoma -- AutoZone Liberty; Memphis

USC vs. Wisconsin -– Camping World Independence; Shreveport

Saturday, Dec. 17

Appalachian State vs. Alabama -- TaxSlayer (formerly Gator - c’mon, just call it Gator again); Jacksonville

Probable winners?

Clemson, Western Michigan (upset special!), Washington, Ohio State, Michigan, Florida State (throws in wrench), Wisconsin, Alabama

Alabama

Clemson

Ohio State

Washington

Michigan

Wisconsin

Florida State

Western Michigan

Then let’s go for highest vs. lowest surviving seeds for contests in the following week's semifinal bowls. Regional attractions can remain a factor where a match-up lands:

Wednesday, Dec. 21

Wisconsin v. Ohio State -- Hyundai Sun; El Paso

Friday, Dec. 23

Western Michigan v. Alabama -- Goodyear Cotton; Dallas

Saturday, Dec. 24

Florida State v. Clemson — Chick-fil-A Peach; Atlanta

Michigan v. Washington -- Northwestern Mutual Rose Bowl, Pasadena

Probable winners?

Michigan, Wisconsin (shock?), Alabama, Clemson

Final Four of sorts/Friday, Dec. 30 (featuring surviving seeds, low vs. high

Wisconsin v. Alabama – BattleFrog Fiesta Bowl, Tempe

Michigan v. Clemson— Orange Bowl, Miami

Probable winners?

Alabama, Michigan

Championship game, Monday, Jan. 9

Michigan v. Alabama– Allstate Sugar; New Orleans

Sure, a variation of this may end up this way regardless in the present four-team system. But the fun is to let it all play out. What’s wrong with that?

Send your best idea for a SXSW panel

Developing an idea for a South by Southwest panel discussion or solo presentation sounds easy enough. According to SXSW staffers, it is - as long as one follows a few simple tips.

But essentially, when formulating an idea for the SXSW PanelPicker, you are creating a business proposal. You're explaining why your idea/issue/service/technique is worth up to an hour of people's time for discussion and contemplation. And remember, your proposal would be competing with those submitted from thousands of people.

SXSW staffers are visiting several Texas cities, sharing those helpful tips with people who might be interested in submitting a proposal for the 2017 SXSW festival. More than 20 San Antonians showed up at the Geekdom Event Centre on July 7 to get the lowdown.

The first thing to keep in mind is that the panel selection is a community-driven process. The submission window for the 2017 festival began June 28 and ends July 22. This includes interactive, film and music portions, and SXSWedu.

The public first takes a crack at voting on the most worthy proposals Aug. 8-Sept. 2. Then a panel of experts in the programming subject tracks will vote on the submissions, followed by SXSW staff. Oct. 17 is the day when everybody finds out which proposals have been chosen for programming.

SXSW staffers said it's important for submitters to realize that this is their chance to help keep the festival feeling fresh with new ideas. The festival seeks cutting-edge topics that are exciting not only to the solo presenter/panel of speakers but to the audience.

Your proposal should focus on the future -- how your app or service or emerging industry or issue impacts us now and could affect us down the road.

It should be a subject, staffers said, that will keep the audience engaged for 45 minutes to an hour and afterward. It should be something that creates chatter. The title, however straight-forward or quirky, should reflect the subject and presentation around which you're crafting your proposal.

The proposal itself should be in-depth and specific as possible. If it's a panel discussion, the submitter should know now who the speakers would be. Indicate whether the panel (or solo presentation) will include a video or PowerPoint.

The staffers noted, perhaps not surprisingly, that a video - even a brief, non-professional piece - will help keep the audience's attention.

If it's a solo session, the same rule applies in terms of picking an interest about which you're most passionate. At the same time, it's a topic that will feel totally new to the audience or at least have a different angle.

The South by staffers acknowledged the diversity matters. Racial, sexual preference, spiritual, socioeconomic -- it doesn't matter. A difference of opinion among all the programmed speakers is welcome.

And while it sounds too easy to remember, sometimes people take it for granted: Spelling and grammar. Yes, of course these are important to the proposal. It should look professional, no different than a business.

Staffers said this helps further show the submitter's dedication, effort and seriousness about the subject matter. The festival wants you to look your best.

So, get to writing that profound proposal for the PanelPicker. It does not have to a groundbreaking debut for an app such as Twitter or Foursquare. But it should be reflection of your passion and its potential impact on the world.

Plus, it's a chance for you -- hello, San Antonio -- to represent your community to the world at SXSW. Be a part of San Antonio's formal participation at the festival.

"Captain America: Civil War" makes me happy and sad

When Captain American and Iron Man finally go at it, one on one, late in "Captain America: Civil War," it follows a scene filled with emotion. While it's fun to see all the superheroes take each other on as a result of a philosophical squabble, a terribly incident long ago seemingly permanently divides Steve Rogers and Tony Stark as friends and colleagues.

Although "Captain America: Civil War" has its share of tremendous action set pieces, it has enough human drama, emotional deft and touches of humor that it never fails to lose its connection with fans.

After all, this is a popcorn movie based on comic book characters. This and practically all other Marvel films still have retained their sense of fun, and they remain linked with their fans who have built up a relationship - if you will - with said movies (X-Men and Spider-man included) over the last decade or so. Even "Deadpool," with its language and graphic violence, is just like its comic inspiration -- a guilty pleasure.

I'm sure I'm among many people who also want to see some kind of success at DC with their efforts to crank out blockbuster movies based on iconic DC comic characters, finally arriving with Justice League. I wanted to like "Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice" so much. I'm sure this sentiment is familiar to other fans. But as expected, the differences between the DC and Marvel film universes are becoming only more stark, and worrisome for DC.

I could only recall the smile on my face when Stark and Rogers engage each other in "Civil War" -- about whether to reign in the Avengers whose efforts to save the world don't come without deadly consequences to innocent bystanders. It's intriguing that a similar subplot between Captain America/Iron Man/Avengers and B v S -- the debate over the actions of supposed superheroes and whether those heroes should show restraint while trying to do "the right thing."

And yet, almost every conversation between Batman/Bruce Wayne and Superman/Clark Kent in B v S is filled needlessly with dread, so overwrought.  You want to grin briefly at Easter eggs in "Dawn of Justice," but you're afraid to because the film is practically devoid of humor and joy. Cynicism abounds.

Sure, the battle with Doomsday was not as exhausting or destructive as the Superman/Zod fight in "Man of Steel," Jesse Eisenberg's Luthor was enigmatic, and Wonder Woman's full debut was electrifying. But as we have seen by now, the literal and figurative dark tone of B v S was distracting, at the least.

By comparison, "Civil War" -- buoyed by brighter colors and optimism - effortlessly zips from the plot's conflicts involving Zemo and Teams Captain and Iron Man to  bursts of sheer geek joy. There's Ant Man who shows up in - well - an impressive way. There's Chadwick Boseman who makes one eager to see the standalone Black Panther flick.

Then there is perhaps, finally, a definitive big-screen Spider-man/Peter Parker when we least expected it. World, Tom Holland. Tom Holland, the world. The newcomer gave Parker/Spider-man a a nerdy/dorky/wondrous feel that we had been missing for the most part from Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield.

"Captain America: Civil War" is definitely one the best Marvel films, and very important. It's all parts fun, funny, emotional and devastating. Pretty much like most previous Marvel films. It help lays a path for the future of Captain America and the Avengers with the same kind of adventurous personality of its cinematic predecessors without all the brooding and worry over "God vs. man" in B v S and the setup toward Justice League.

Perhaps with the behind-the-scenes troubles being endured with "Aquaman" and "The Flash" movies, and the promotion of Ben Affleck to executive producer," will give hope to the idea that Warner Bros. realize the DC/Justice League film universe can be fun and games without all the darkness.

"The Force Awakens" is not the "Star Wars" film we want, but the one we need

We Star Wars fans have built up in our minds incredible expectations -- variations of what should be said and done in the new Disney-fied Star Wars universe, especially now that the canon of post-Return of the Jedi books won't be a source of material.

I know the new canon disappoints those who wanted to spoil The Force Awakens for many, out of spite for JJ Abrams, Disney and the new vision that we'll be seeing in the new films, TV series, books, etc.

The rest of us wanted to be connected once more to the original trilogy, because it was that special. The original films changed Hollywood and pop culture forever. A grand, epic, classic battle of good vs. evil seen through the eyes of a few memorable characters. A story told with a flourish and with special effects and sets that, at the time, seemed beyond their time.

The problem with the prequel Star Wars trilogy, is that George Lucas overthought things. He has been a good storyteller and had his heart in the right place. But given a tremendous budget and technology that he could have only dreamed of as a younger filmmaker, Lucas crafted a needlessly convoluted subplot, provided clunky dialogue, and at times offered awkward direction. It was hard to connect to a young Anakin Sykwalker, Padme Amidala, a younger Obi Wan Kenob, etc. At times, the prequel films looked gaudy and the story, the outcome of which we already knew, took a backseat.

With all of this, JJ Abrams and Disney had the work cut out for them in restoring in Star Wars fans their faith, and giving new, younger fans a reason to look forward to a universe that finally expands on the big screen.

Is Abrams an excellent filmmaker and storyteller? No. But like Lucas, he respects the cinematic material that inspired him. Abrams grew up on Star Wars and recognizes exactly what made the entire franchise special, with a special inspiration from the original movies. In planning Episode 7, Abrams did well in enlisting help from producer Kathleen Kennedy, infusing a touch of Spielberg, and from Lawrence Kasdan, who wrote The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi.

I hear complaints that The Force Awakens is no different than Episode 4? Is that entirely a bad thing? Weren't we supposed to have all the feels upon seeing Han Solo, Leia Organa, Chewbacca, C-3PO, R2-D2 and Luke Skywalker for the first time in forever? Fans in the theater cheered and applauded with each reveal. When the Millennium Falcon takes flight once more, weren't we supposed to feel nostalgic for when the Falcon soared into our minds and hearts in the original films?

But at the same time, the new younger characters of Rey, Finn, Poe and Kylo Ren -- all based on Han, Leia, Luke and Darth Vader loosely in their own ways -- we're meant to connect to them. I found it much easier to connect with Rey, Finn and Poe, from the start, then the primary characters of the prequels. John Boyega, Daisy Ridley and Oscar Isaac played the roles of a lifetime, and are capitalizing on their opportunity to have their characters become memorable like Luke, Han and Leia.

Rey's strength and tenacity, Finn's reluctant hero, Poe's swagger and confidence, and Kylo's ambition to be more than a Vader wannabe, all seem more tangible, more relatable, than Padme, and younger Anakin and Obi Wan appeared in the prequels. The practical special effects and sets balance the CGI. The dialogue, while not the strongest and award-winning, is easy to grasp. The action is well paced.

But perhaps more importantly, The Force Awakens feels like a complete story while opening the door to that aforementioned wider Star Wars universe. We're invested in seeing who Rey really is. We're curious about how Poe and Finn evolve. We want to know more about this First Order, how exactly Kylo came to be who he is. I want to see more Captain Phasma and BB-8.

The Force Awakens is a joy to watch, not a chore like it is to view Episodes 1 and 2. That's all most of us really wanted. (And the racial and gender diversity only makes sense because, after all, it's a frigging big galaxy out there.) Plus, the Easter eggs embedded in Episode 7, guessing which cameo actors portray Stormtroopers, and all of the actors who supplied voices -- watch the end credits -- that's fun, too.

That's the fun. The fun is back. I look forward to not only the development of Finn, Rey, Poe and Ren's universe, but the spinoffs...the other Star Wars stories that are out there: Young Han Solo, young Boba Fett, how the Rebels stole the plans for the first Death Star, God knows what else is coming. Some folks will complain that under Disney, Star Wars stories really won't take much risks. With different directors and writers contributing, we don't know that for sure.

What I do feel is that finally, it's Star Wars for a wider audience and I for one can't be more excited. I do feel like a kid again.

And I still hope one of you gifts me lightsaber or BB-8 this Christmas/festivus.

Imagining a wider college football playoff is an X-mas tradition!

It’s that time of year when I reflect on the past year (very challenging on personal and professional levels), view all of the traditional and non-traditional holiday movies, and stock up on an ungodly amount of tamales and eggnog.

And it’s also time for imagining an ideal NCAA Division I football playoff. It’s fun and a nice break in between all of my writing work. As I have said time and again, just about every other major level of organized sport has some kind of tournament. 

Even the Bahrain goathead kickball league has a playoff system. Let the best teams fight it out for a championship. It was not so much an unfairness about previous ways that a Division I championship game was determined, by mere polls and then a computer.

If a not-so-renowned school ends up winning, so be it. Supporters of a playoff system have heard all the arguments. That the bowl tradition is over. That student-athletes would be distracted from studying for finals. That schools would lose money. Those arguments no longer work. A tournament hasn’t harmed FCS or Division II or III or NAIA schools.

So, how would a wider Division I playoff work? Begin with automatic champions from FBS (Football Championship Series) conferences -- regular-season champs and championship game victors.

If there are co-champions, leave it to that conference to determine who gets what would be an automatic FBS bid. With 10 conferences, we get 12 automatic bids. Then average the rankings of the existing computer rankings, and AP, ESPN and USA Today coaches polls, focusing on which schools get the most place votes, and arrive at a final aggregate Top 25 poll. Top-ranked FBS independents, also, would be considered as usual.

Here’s what a final 2015 FBS aggregate poll would look like, with current conference titleholder status and final regular season record:

1) Clemson (ACC champion)

2) Alabama (SEC champion)

3) Michigan State (Big 10 champion)

4) Oklahoma (Big 12 champion)

5) Stanford (Pac-12 champion)

6) Iowa

7) Ohio State

8) Notre Dame

9) North Carolina

10) Florida State

11) TCU

12) Ole Miss

13) Northwestern

14) Oklahoma State

15) Oregon

16) Michigan

17) Baylor

18) Houston (AAC champion)

19) Florida

20) Utah

21) LSU

22) Navy

23) Temple

24) USC

25) Wisconsin

Unranked conference champions

Western Kentucky (Conference USA champion)

Bowling Green (Mid-American champion)

San Diego State (Mountain West champion)

Arkansas State (Sun Belt champion)

Ultimately, FBS automatic bids would go to Clemson, Alabama, Michigan State, Oklahoma, Stanford, Houston, Western Kentucky, Bowling Green, San Diego State and Arkansas State,

 

You add any top independent team ranked high enough overall in polls for an FBS bid and/or four (or five) other highest-ranked schools, overall in polls. So this year these schools get an at-large bid: Iowa, Ohio State, Notre Dame, North Carolina, Florida State and TCU

The ultimate FBS tournament seedings in a 16 vs. 1, 15 vs. 2, 14, vs. 3, etc. format would be:

1. Clemson

2. Alabama

3. Michigan State

4. Oklahoma

5. Stanford

6. Iowa

7. Ohio State

8. Notre Dame

9. North Carolina

10. Florida State

11. TCU

12. Houston

13. Western Kentucky

14. San Diego State

15. Bowling Green

16. Arkansas State

Now let’s consider the oldest, popular, most lucrative, traditional bowls and mix in some regional flair, possible area rivalry matches and considerate schedules. 

(Let’s digress for a moment: In the process, let’s ditch most of the younger bowls. I mean, cmon, the Miami Beach Bowl? Marmot Boca Rataon Bowl? New Era Pinstripe Bowl, still? Popeyes Bahamas Bowl? Nova Home Loans Arizona Bowl? Quick Lane Bowl, still in Detroit? In winter? Too many bowls dilute the prestige of even earning a shot at postseason play, and permits five-win and six-win teams to get in when they really shouldn't be there.)

OK, tangent over. All joking aside, use 15 of those prestigious, richest, most famous (i.e. powerful, established) bowls as the FBS bowl matches. All other bowls, may stick around for our comical entertainment, to be watched mainly on ESPN the Ocho.

Rotate the FBS bowls as quarterfinal, semifinal and final games, all of which very likely would raise the number of ticket-buyers, TV viewers and payouts. Why? There would be a greater incentive to play in such a lucrative bowl. A chance to advance and win a won-on-the-field title. All the conference champs and at-large bidders get a fair shot.

Looking at the 2015 calendar, the younger, Decemberish bowls host quarterfinals on various days: 1 vs. 16, 2 vs. 15, 3 vs. 14, 4 vs. 13, 5 vs. 12, 6 vs. 11, 7 vs. 10, and 8 vs. 9.

Tuesday, Dec. 15

TCU vs. Iowa– Motel 6 Catcus (formerly Copper, Insight, Buffalo Wild Wings); Tempe

Wednesday, Dec. 16

Arkansas State vs. Clemson -- Buffalo Wild Wings Citrus (formerly Tangerine, Capital One); Orlando

Houston vs. Stanford-- Holiday; San Diego

Thursday, Dec. 17

Bowling Green vs. Alabama -- Outback (formerly Hall of Fame); Tampa

San Diego State vs. Michigan State -- Valero Alamo;

Friday, Dec. 18

Florida State vs. Ohio State -- AutoZone Liberty; Memphis

Western Kentucky vs. Oklahoma – Camping World Independence; Shreveport

Saturday, Dec. 19

North Carolina vs. Notre Dame-- TaxSlayer (formerly Gator); Jacksonville

Probable winners?

Iowa, Clemson, Houston (upset special!), Alabama, Michigan State, Ohio State, Oklahoma, North Carolina (upset special!)

I’m departing from previous years worth of scenarios and going for highest vs. lowest surviving seeds for match-ups in bowls in the following week's semifinals. Regional match-up is still a priority as best as it can be considered.

Wednesday, Dec. 23

Ohio State vs. Michigan State -- Allstate Sugar; New Orleans

Friday, Dec. 25

Houston vs. Clemson -- Goodyear Cotton; Dallas

Saturday, Dec. 26

North Carolina vs. Alabama -- Chick-fil-A Peach; Atlanta

Iowa vs. Oklahoma -- Hyundai Sun; El Paso

Probable winners?

Ohio State, Clemson, Alabama, Iowa (screw the Sooners)

Final Four of sorts/Friday, Jan. 1 (featuring surviving seeds, low vs. high

Iowa vs. Alabama – BattleFrog Fiesta Bowl, Tempe

Ohio State vs. Clemson-- Orange Bowl, Miami

Probable winners?

Alabama, Clemson

Championship game, Monday, Jan. 11

Alabama vs. Clemson– Northwestern Mutual Rose Bowl, Pasadena

Sure, it may end up being this way anyway in the current four-team system. But the fun is letting all play out. Because if you don’t let them play it out on the field, you’re a damn Commie.